DETECT THE ART OF DECEPTION THROUGH THE USAGE OF WORDS
With the intention of deceiving arguments can be fallaciously used to wage mass control on human mind. These unsound arguments lead to mistaken belief. As a result people would have faulty thinking or incorrect view. People misbelieve something and interpret it wrong. By the time this type of misapprehension sets up strongly in mind. But, the terrible outcome is that these irrational arguments have been firmly maintained even contradicted to become an idiosyncracy. It means a mode of thought peculiar to an individual. People are living in such a delusion owing to controlled media in all corners of the world. This way of thinking has deluded people to have wrong senses or perceive or interpret things in a false ideas.
People are living in illusion of art, psychology, power and literature. They take a life in fantasy or with the things impossible or improbable because of imaginative faculty. They haven’t know that someone has used sophistry or deliberately applied arguments to put their mind under control. They have never seen the truth that they are resolving moral questions by use of clever but unsound reasoning. It’s called casuistry. That’s why mass media is now using equivocation or the art of deceiving with ambiguous language.
It aims at concealing the truth or avoiding a commitment. One of its common way is the faulty analogy. It consists in assumption that because two things are alike in one or more aspects, they necessarily become alike in some others. This false arguments are all times leading to non sequitur – i.e a conclusion or statement that does not logically follow from the previous argument. Colloquially, it also means the straw man fallacy. People make commitment when ignoring a person’s actual position and substituting a distorted, exaggerated or mispresented version. They have applied the red herring fallacy in an artful way. To divert people’s attention on the original issues an irrelevant topic would be slyly introduced in arguments.
The slippery slope fallacy has been widespread used assert that some event must inevitably from another without an argument as result of its inevitability of the issue in question. This deception becomes too smart with the ad hominem-the character, motive or other attributes would be attacked instead of the substance of the argument. At last the post hoc fallacy appears as since event P followed event Q, event Q has been caused by event P. They mind their P’s and Q’s in a too fallacious way that what is true of a member of a group is true for the group as a whole!
